Monday, December 8, 2014

Polar Bear Plunge E-Commerce: Analytics Overview and Recommendations



For this exercise I have taken an in-depth look at how Special Olympics New Jersey’s e-commerce sites for the Seaside Polar Plunge have been using analytics to monitor and interpret customer (Plunger and Donor) traffic. The organization has really only begun to scratch the surface when it comes to using analytical data to guide decision making, so there are many tools that could improve analytic efforts. Currently, SONJ uses Google Analytics to assess analytical data. The objectives of the Polar Plunge event organizers are to recruit NEW Plungers, retain past Plungers, and bring in more donations than previous years. A secondary goal is to increase the average Plunger amount raised over the 2014 Plunge, which is a goal tied to generally increasing donations. 

E-Commerce Functionality and Funnels
Currently SONJ has GA set up in both the website’s homepage, which is hosted on Wordpress (www.njpolarplunge.org) and in the Seaside-specific registration page (http://seaside-pbp.kintera.org/), which is hosted on Kintera, a fundraising tool. The e-commerce functionality is two-fold (soon to be three-fold, with the addition of an online Plunge store): visitors can pay to register to participate in the event and donors can complete a transaction to give money to the cause. The current expected funnel for a registrant is to go to the njpolarplunge.org homepage, click the “Seaside Registration” button, be transitioned to the Kintera landing homepage, and then begin the registration process by agreeing to the Waiver (the first step in the registration process).  The funnel for a donor varies a bit more, but he or she would receive the personal fundraising link of the Plunger (via email or social media, typically), click over to the Plunger’s site, click the donate button and follow the check-out process. 

Current Analytics & Recommendations
            Registration for the 2015 Plunge opened in early October 2014, so GA has only been tracking data since that time.  SONJ has primarily been interested in visitor behavior in terms of which pages were viewed and exited from the most, which sites have referred the most traffic, and which pages have the highest bounce rates. Since visitors can only take a small amount of action on the njpolarplunge.org site (click “Register” or “Home” for one of the Plunge registration pages), for those GA, SONJ has only been interested in how visitors got to that page and whether or not they bounced. A high bounce rate on njpolarplunge.org could mean that visitors are confused about why the site doesn’t “look like Plunge” and aren’t bothering to click anywhere (and therefore not being redirected to the registration pages) before resorting to Google search to find what they are looking for.
As for the Kintera analytics, the top two landing pages are the home page (7% of traffic) and the “Join a Team” page (2% of traffic). These number opens up all kinds of potential analytics for SONJ to perform. Since Kintera allows individual Plungers to create their own pages, the site has amassed to 16,000 pages (!). Clearly a vast majority of traffic is bypassing the homepage ,“find a donor” page, and event info pages all together, since donors are directly accessing the “landing pages” of their Plunger friends. Additionally, registered Plungers aren’t going back to the homepage – they’re able to do most of their Plunge-related fundraising through their own mini-sites. Knowing this information can help SONJ determine the types of content that should really be up on the homepage. If Plungers aren’t accessing it, other communications strategies should be implemented.
            In terms of traffic to the Kintera registration homepage, direct traffic represents 31% of visits. Facebook brings in another 35%, 15% are coming in from njpolarplunge.org, and only 7% are making their way to the page from organic search. Other smaller sites make up the negligible difference. These data show SONJ that time and attention needs to be paid to organic search. Search engine optimization techniques are free, and yet they are only bringing in 7% of visitor traffic. SONJ should start digging a little deeper by setting up conversion goals to see how much direct, social and organic search traffic is actually converting. If all 7% of those organic searchers have converted, SONJ immediately needs to start investing time in better SEO. If only a small percentage of visitors from the social traffic are actually converting into Plungers or donors, SONJ needs to determine why. Are users confused by the process (analyze the pages with the highest exit rates) or are they not even starting the registration process after arriving at the homepage (analyze the initial bounce rate)? 

Other Recommendations
            The first recommendation for SONJ is to create goals within the GA system. Each registration is worth at least $100 (the fundraising minimum to Plunge), so it is an easy goal to understand and measure other analytics against. For example, SONJ could view new vs. returning visitors and see how many visitors are actually registering on their first visit to the site. From there, SONJ can assess how many sessions it takes for a visitor to actually achieve the registration goal. As for donors, SONJ can filter the donor-related traffic using a regular expression to see how many visits it takes a donor to actually donate. Knowing this information can help SONJ assess the donor user experience – is it cumbersome? Can they find the Plunger they want to donate to? Are they dropping out of the donation process for a particular reason?
            Another recommendation for SONJ is to turn on the e-commerce tracking functionality within GA. This is a great way for event organizers to test out registration codes and discounts to see if they are truly generating more revenue. The e-commerce functionality will also tell SONJ exactly how long it takes a registrant to actually sign up, or a donor to actually make a donation. All the revenue data will be available within the GA interface, allowing for more efficient data analysis.
            Finally, SONJ should set up some events within GA to help determine exactly what content is most relevant to visitors. While the site is primarily used for registration only, it would be interesting to see exactly how many visitors are downloading event information PDFs, clicking on photo albums, or viewing incentive items. Understanding these ancillary actions will help SONJ answer the BIG question about the user-friendliness of both njpolarplunge.org and the registration website: are visitors able to access the important logistical information and fundraising tools they need, and where should visitors be getting the event information they need to have the best Plunge experience possible and raise the most amount of dollars possible?
           

No comments:

Post a Comment